Exact content review
Identify each post URL, account and platform. A request about one post does not automatically cover reposts, screenshots or other accounts.
READING THIS ENTRYResearching public records
How to interpret this record
Social Media Post Removal Review & Requests
A useful public record has an identity, a scope and a source. Research becomes more reliable when those elements travel with the number or statement being discussed.
Write down the claim first
Identify exactly what you want to know: who holds an office, whether someone appears on a ballot, what a committee reported spending, or how a member voted on a question. Each claim calls for a different source. A biography, a campaign website and a financial report can all be useful without answering the same question.
Keep identity, scope and date together
Record the entity identifier, jurisdiction, election or reporting period and source publication. These details prevent a correct fact from being attached to the wrong person, place or time. A name-only match can be misleading, especially when campaigns or institutions have changed names or when a person has sought several offices.
Read the full researching public records guide →Content review · Commercial service
Social post removal review
Start with the evidence, not a removal promise.
If a social post raises a genuine privacy, impersonation, intellectual-property or other valid concern, we can review whether a supported request is appropriate. Each platform makes its own decision.
Request a scoped quote anthony@election.orgCustom quote. Availability and deliverables confirmed before work begins.
What we scope togetherA case-specific assessment of grounds and the request path, not guaranteed deletion.
The working brief
What your quote should cover.
Confirm what is included, what is not and who approves it.
Supporting evidence
Establish your relationship to the content and the factual or policy grounds. Sensitive documentation belongs in an agreed secure channel, not the first email.
Request-path assessment
Distinguish a platform report, a rights-holder request and a matter requiring qualified legal counsel. Confirm which work can be undertaken.
Decision tracking
Define which requests and responses are tracked, how updates are communicated and what is outside the engagement.
From inquiry to scope
A clear path forward.
Describe the concern
Provide URLs and a factual summary. Do not email identity documents or private personal information.
Review eligibility
Check evidence, authority and the platform's current process before agreeing an engagement.
Track the response
Any approved request follows the relevant process; the platform retains the removal decision.
Before you commit
Your questions, answered.
Can you remove criticism or an unfavorable opinion?
An unfavorable opinion is not itself a removal ground. We do not offer fabricated reports, impersonation, suppression of lawful criticism or alteration of Electionpedia's public record.
Is search delisting the same as deleting a post?
No. Delisting changes eligible search results; the original post may remain available at its source. A platform takedown, search delisting and removal of a repost are separate requests.
How quickly will a platform remove a post?
There is no guaranteed removal or deadline. Eligibility, evidence, platform review and any appeal affect the result. The written engagement describes the work rather than promising a decision.
Your next step
Let’s scope the right work.
Tell Anthony what you need, your timeline and what is ready. Pricing and availability are confirmed in a written quote.
Email Anthony anthony@election.orgKeep credentials, contact lists and sensitive evidence out of your initial email.
Related work
Explore your next step.
The public record is not for sale.
These are commercial services, separate from Electionpedia’s nonpartisan public record. Payment never buys favorable coverage, a ranking, a hidden correction or a change to political facts.
Public-record corrections are always free →