Electionpedia.comMichael Mccormack (The Nationals) won Riverina after preferences by 26,715 votes over Mark Jeffreson (Australian Labor Party).
After preferences, Michael Mccormack received 66,276 votes (62.62%). Mark Jeffreson received 39,561 votes (37.38%).
Ranked here by first-preference votes. The elected member is determined by the full preferential count, not necessarily the primary-vote order.
| Primary rank | Candidate | Party | Ballot | First preferences | Primary share | Final TCP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michael MccormackElectedAEC historical incumbent marker | The Nationals | 11 | 42,678 | 40.32% | 66,276 · 62.62% · +2.91 pp swing |
| 2 | Mark Jeffreson | Australian Labor Party | 5 | 19,506 | 18.43% | 39,561 · 37.38% · -2.91 pp swing |
| 3 | Mark Craig | Pauline Hanson's One Nation | 1 | 10,427 | 9.85% | Not a TCP finalist |
| 4 | Jenny Rolfe | Independent | 12 | 6,909 | 6.53% | Not a TCP finalist |
| 5 | James Gooden | Independent | 9 | 5,080 | 4.80% | Not a TCP finalist |
| 6 | Pheonix Valxori | The Greens | 8 | 4,767 | 4.50% | Not a TCP finalist |
| 7 | Desiree Gregory | Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party | 2 | 4,217 | 3.98% | Not a TCP finalist |
| 8 | Christine Onley | Libertarian | 13 | 2,338 | 2.21% | Not a TCP finalist |
| 9 | Richard Foley | Citizens Party | 7 | 2,233 | 2.11% | Not a TCP finalist |
| 10 | Mark Burge | Family First | 3 | 2,151 | 2.03% | Not a TCP finalist |
| 11 | Grant Hardwick | Independent | 6 | 1,861 | 1.76% | Not a TCP finalist |
| 12 | Barbara Baikie | Independent | 4 | 1,858 | 1.76% | Not a TCP finalist |
| 13 | Jake Davis | Independent | 10 | 1,812 | 1.71% | Not a TCP finalist |
These are official final results for the 3 May 2025 federal election. They are historical election records, not a claim about the current House membership or future candidacies.
Candidate biographies, policy positions, political finance, current tenure, and future candidacy remain separate sourced layers.
Riverina Election Result 2025: Michael Mccormack Won
An election result is a dated publication about a defined contest and reporting area. Certification status, ballot accounting and the voting system determine what the numbers can support.
A preliminary publication, an election-night update and a final certified result describe different stages. Electionpedia retains the source’s status rather than treating every displayed number as final. For historical research, the source version remains important because later corrections can change a total without changing the identity of the election.
A vote share needs a denominator: candidate votes, valid votes, ballots cast or another published base. Turnout can use a different base again. Compare the labels before comparing percentages. A margin in votes and a margin in percentage points answer related but different questions.
Read the full election results guide →