SERVEL preliminary workbook · commune

Antofagasta 2025 presidential results.

Every counted source table for this geography, aggregated separately for the first round and second vote.

253.257workbook second-vote total

228.158workbook valid votes

779tables represented

307.083registered electors in those tables

First round · 16 November

244.833 valid votes

Source total 254.654 · valid + null + blank difference +1.330

Vote order 1Franco Parisi Fernandez

79.669 · 32.54%

Vote order 2Jeannette Jara Roman

60.507 · 24.71%

Vote order 3Jose Antonio Kast Rist

44.020 · 17.98%

Vote order 4Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen

31.798 · 12.99%

Vote order 5Evelyn Matthei Fornet

20.661 · 8.44%

Vote order 6Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul

4.065 · 1.66%

Vote order 7Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio

2.738 · 1.12%

Vote order 8Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti

1.375 · 0.56%

Null: 8.137
Blank: 3.014
Source total: 254.654

Second vote · 14 December

228.158 valid votes

Source total 253.257 · valid + null + blank difference +1.017

Vote order 1Jose Antonio Kast Rist

125.117 · 54.84%

Vote order 2Jeannette Jara Roman

103.041 · 45.16%

Null: 22.228
Blank: 3.888
Source total: 253.257

Source boundary

A workbook aggregation, not a legal final count.

Official preliminary results published by SERVEL under article 185 of Law 18.700; the source says they have no legal value as a vote count. The national portal and workbook rollup differ, so this page does not claim to reproduce the portal total.

Source label: ANTOFAGASTA.

Reading guideElection results

How to interpret this record

Antofagasta Chile 2025 Presidential Election Results

An election result is a dated publication about a defined contest and reporting area. Certification status, ballot accounting and the voting system determine what the numbers can support.

Identify the election and the reporting stage

A preliminary publication, an election-night update and a final certified result describe different stages. Electionpedia retains the source’s status rather than treating every displayed number as final. For historical research, the source version remains important because later corrections can change a total without changing the identity of the election.

Read the denominator

A vote share needs a denominator: candidate votes, valid votes, ballots cast or another published base. Turnout can use a different base again. Compare the labels before comparing percentages. A margin in votes and a margin in percentage points answer related but different questions.

Read the full election results guide →