Electionpedia.com
SERVEL preliminary workbook · commune

Los Angeles 2025 presidential results.

Every counted source table for this geography, aggregated separately for the first round and second vote.

157.977workbook second-vote total
148.189workbook valid votes
462tables represented
177.729registered electors in those tables
First round · 16 November

153.871 valid votes

Source total 158.831 · valid + null + blank difference +297

Vote order 1Jose Antonio Kast Rist

49.589 · 32.23%

Vote order 2Franco Parisi Fernandez

39.547 · 25.70%

Vote order 3Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen

24.800 · 16.12%

Vote order 4Jeannette Jara Roman

22.426 · 14.57%

Vote order 5Evelyn Matthei Fornet

14.074 · 9.15%

Vote order 6Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul

1.402 · 0.91%

Vote order 7Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio

1.322 · 0.86%

Vote order 8Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti

711 · 0.46%

Null
3.745
Blank
1.512
Source total
158.831
Second vote · 14 December

148.189 valid votes

Source total 157.977 · valid + null + blank difference +677

Vote order 1Jose Antonio Kast Rist

111.957 · 75.55%

Vote order 2Jeannette Jara Roman

36.232 · 24.45%

Null
8.817
Blank
1.648
Source total
157.977
Source boundary

A workbook aggregation, not a legal final count.

Official preliminary results published by SERVEL under article 185 of Law 18.700; the source says they have no legal value as a vote count. The national portal and workbook rollup differ, so this page does not claim to reproduce the portal total.

Source label: LOS ANGELES.

How to interpret this record

Los Angeles Chile 2025 Presidential Election Results

An election result is a dated publication about a defined contest and reporting area. Certification status, ballot accounting and the voting system determine what the numbers can support.

Identify the election and the reporting stage

A preliminary publication, an election-night update and a final certified result describe different stages. Electionpedia retains the source’s status rather than treating every displayed number as final. For historical research, the source version remains important because later corrections can change a total without changing the identity of the election.

Read the denominator

A vote share needs a denominator: candidate votes, valid votes, ballots cast or another published base. Turnout can use a different base again. Compare the labels before comparing percentages. A margin in votes and a margin in percentage points answer related but different questions.

Read the full election results guide →