Electionpedia.comChristian Karl Friedhelm Haase (CDU) was elected from Höxter – Gütersloh III – Lippe II with 43.1% of first votes.
Christian Karl Friedhelm Haase won the constituency seat for Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands. The official elected-candidates file records a 43.14% first-vote share.
Ranked by first votes. Party labels are official result choices, not substitutes for a complete candidate roster.
The second vote determines proportional party entitlement and whether a constituency plurality receives seat coverage.
| Rank | Party or choice | Votes | Share | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CDUMost second votes | 51,320 | 36.45% | +3.95 pp |
| 2 | AfD | 29,045 | 20.63% | +11.97 pp |
| 3 | SPD | 23,881 | 16.96% | -10.28 pp |
| 4 | GRÜNE | 11,757 | 8.35% | -2.71 pp |
| 5 | Die Linke | 7,905 | 5.62% | +2.79 pp |
| 6 | FDP | 6,076 | 4.32% | -7.32 pp |
| 7 | BSW | 5,563 | 3.95% | No comparison |
| 8 | Tierschutzpartei | 1,669 | 1.19% | +0.02 pp |
| 9 | FREIE WÄHLER | 1,067 | 0.76% | -0.01 pp |
| 10 | Die PARTEI | 702 | 0.50% | -0.53 pp |
| 11 | Volt | 520 | 0.37% | +0.23 pp |
| 12 | dieBasis | 399 | 0.28% | -0.95 pp |
| 13 | 242 | 0.17% | +0.14 pp | |
| 14 | Team Todenhöfer | 218 | 0.15% | -0.10 pp |
| 15 | BÜNDNIS DEUTSCHLAND | 209 | 0.15% | No comparison |
| 16 | WerteUnion | 160 | 0.11% | No comparison |
| 17 | MERA25 | 29 | 0.02% | No comparison |
| 18 | MLPD | 17 | 0.01% | +0.00 pp |
The official site no longer makes the complete 2025 candidate CSV available online. The source compiler therefore publishes every official first- and second-vote choice but names only elected people supported by the separate elected-candidates file.
These are official final results for the 23 February 2025 federal election. First votes and second votes are separate. A first-vote plurality did not always produce a constituency seat under the 2025 second-vote-coverage rule.
Höxter – Gütersloh III – Lippe II Election Result 2025: Christian Karl Friedhelm Haase
An election result is a dated publication about a defined contest and reporting area. Certification status, ballot accounting and the voting system determine what the numbers can support.
A preliminary publication, an election-night update and a final certified result describe different stages. Electionpedia retains the source’s status rather than treating every displayed number as final. For historical research, the source version remains important because later corrections can change a total without changing the identity of the election.
A vote share needs a denominator: candidate votes, valid votes, ballots cast or another published base. Turnout can use a different base again. Compare the labels before comparing percentages. A margin in votes and a margin in percentage points answer related but different questions.
Read the full election results guide →