First-ranked direct candidate
Tommaso Foti
92,699 valid direct-candidate votes · 52.53%.
Official Ministry open data · single-member district
EMILIA-ROMAGNA - U01 (PIACENZA) result.
Tommaso Foti received 92,699 votes (52.53%) and ranked first in EMILIA-ROMAGNA - U01 (PIACENZA) in the official Italian Ministry 2022 Chamber open-data file.
All published direct candidates
11 candidates, every associated list.
The candidate total can exceed the associated list marks because the source separately records ballots marked only for the direct candidate.
| Candidate | Associated lists | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tommaso FotiFirst-ranked · source-derived district winner | 92,699 | 52.53% | |
| Beatrice GhettiRank 2 | 45,309 | 25.68% | |
| Carmine De FalcoRank 3 | MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE 13,717Candidate-only difference: 821 | 14,538 | 8.24% |
| Sabrina De CanioRank 4 | AZIONE - ITALIA VIVA - CALENDA 12,657Candidate-only difference: 823 | 13,480 | 7.64% |
| Cinzia CicogniniRank 5 | ITALEXIT PER L'ITALIA 3,151Candidate-only difference: 143 | 3,294 | 1.87% |
| Elisa ZerbiniRank 6 | ITALIA SOVRANA E POPOLARE 2,342Candidate-only difference: 97 | 2,439 | 1.38% |
| Elena Maria AnelliRank 7 | UNIONE POPOLARE CON DE MAGISTRIS 1,717Candidate-only difference: 110 | 1,827 | 1.04% |
| Enrico ScottiRank 8 | VITA 1,428Candidate-only difference: 73 | 1,501 | 0.85% |
| Rosario BrancatiRank 9 | PARTITO ANIMALISTA - UCDL - 10 VOLTE MEGLIO 949Candidate-only difference: 84 | 1,033 | 0.59% |
| Roberto CalestaniRank 10 | MASTELLA NOI DI CENTRO EUROPEISTI 181Candidate-only difference: 25 | 206 | 0.12% |
| Tracy Konadu ApontuahRank 11 | SUD CHIAMA NORD 131Candidate-only difference: 8 | 139 | 0.08% |
Reading guideElection results
How to interpret this record
EMILIA-ROMAGNA - U01 (PIACENZA) 2022 Chamber result
An election result is a dated publication about a defined contest and reporting area. Certification status, ballot accounting and the voting system determine what the numbers can support.
Identify the election and the reporting stage
A preliminary publication, an election-night update and a final certified result describe different stages. Electionpedia retains the source’s status rather than treating every displayed number as final. For historical research, the source version remains important because later corrections can change a total without changing the identity of the election.
Read the denominator
A vote share needs a denominator: candidate votes, valid votes, ballots cast or another published base. Turnout can use a different base again. Compare the labels before comparing percentages. A margin in votes and a margin in percentage points answer related but different questions.
Read the full election results guide →