First-ranked direct candidate
Vannia Gava
97,828 valid direct-candidate votes · 55.01%.
Official Ministry open data · single-member district
FRIULI-VENEZIA GIULIA - U01 (PORDENONE) result.
Vannia Gava received 97,828 votes (55.01%) and ranked first in FRIULI-VENEZIA GIULIA - U01 (PORDENONE) in the official Italian Ministry 2022 Chamber open-data file.
All published direct candidates
10 candidates, every associated list.
The candidate total can exceed the associated list marks because the source separately records ballots marked only for the direct candidate.
| Candidate | Associated lists | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vannia GavaFirst-ranked · source-derived district winner | 97,828 | 55.01% | |
| Gloria FavretRank 2 | 39,363 | 22.13% | |
| Teresa Tassan ViolRank 3 | AZIONE - ITALIA VIVA - CALENDA 15,261Candidate-only difference: 1,095 | 16,356 | 9.20% |
| Luca SutRank 4 | MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE 10,598Candidate-only difference: 566 | 11,164 | 6.28% |
| Ester DildaRank 5 | ITALEXIT PER L'ITALIA 5,025Candidate-only difference: 174 | 5,199 | 2.92% |
| Giuseppe GuerraRank 6 | ITALIA SOVRANA E POPOLARE 2,515Candidate-only difference: 92 | 2,607 | 1.47% |
| Ambra FedrigoRank 7 | VITA 2,422Candidate-only difference: 139 | 2,561 | 1.44% |
| Gian Luigi BettoliRank 8 | UNIONE POPOLARE CON DE MAGISTRIS 1,741Candidate-only difference: 151 | 1,892 | 1.06% |
| Vladimiro CampelloRank 9 | ALTERNATIVA PER L'ITALIA - NO GREEN PASS 652Candidate-only difference: 54 | 706 | 0.40% |
| Cinzia BraulineseRank 10 | MASTELLA NOI DI CENTRO EUROPEISTI 151Candidate-only difference: 21 | 172 | 0.10% |
Reading guideElection results
How to interpret this record
FRIULI-VENEZIA GIULIA - U01 (PORDENONE) 2022 Chamber result
An election result is a dated publication about a defined contest and reporting area. Certification status, ballot accounting and the voting system determine what the numbers can support.
Identify the election and the reporting stage
A preliminary publication, an election-night update and a final certified result describe different stages. Electionpedia retains the source’s status rather than treating every displayed number as final. For historical research, the source version remains important because later corrections can change a total without changing the identity of the election.
Read the denominator
A vote share needs a denominator: candidate votes, valid votes, ballots cast or another published base. Turnout can use a different base again. Compare the labels before comparing percentages. A margin in votes and a margin in percentage points answer related but different questions.
Read the full election results guide →