First-ranked direct candidate
Alessandro Palombi
99,319 valid direct-candidate votes · 50.71%.
Official Ministry open data · single-member district
LAZIO 1 - U09 (GUIDONIA MONTECELIO) result.
Alessandro Palombi received 99,319 votes (50.71%) and ranked first in LAZIO 1 - U09 (GUIDONIA MONTECELIO) in the official Italian Ministry 2022 Chamber open-data file.
All published direct candidates
9 candidates, every associated list.
The candidate total can exceed the associated list marks because the source separately records ballots marked only for the direct candidate.
| Candidate | Associated lists | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alessandro PalombiFirst-ranked · source-derived district winner | 99,319 | 50.71% | |
| Marco VincenziRank 2 | 45,845 | 23.41% | |
| Viviana CarbonaraRank 3 | MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE 29,954Candidate-only difference: 1,343 | 31,297 | 15.98% |
| Giovanna MarcheseRank 4 | AZIONE - ITALIA VIVA - CALENDA 9,269Candidate-only difference: 549 | 9,818 | 5.01% |
| Gianni GoliaRank 5 | ITALEXIT PER L'ITALIA 3,136Candidate-only difference: 104 | 3,240 | 1.65% |
| Roberto PennaRank 6 | UNIONE POPOLARE CON DE MAGISTRIS 2,557Candidate-only difference: 152 | 2,709 | 1.38% |
| Matteo Di CoccoRank 7 | ITALIA SOVRANA E POPOLARE 2,338Candidate-only difference: 81 | 2,419 | 1.24% |
| Nemesio RinaldiRank 8 | VITA 905Candidate-only difference: 49 | 954 | 0.49% |
| Concetta SantonastasoRank 9 | PARTITO DELLA FOLLIA CREATIVA 234Candidate-only difference: 22 | 256 | 0.13% |
Reading guideElection results
How to interpret this record
LAZIO 1 - U09 (GUIDONIA MONTECELIO) 2022 Chamber result
An election result is a dated publication about a defined contest and reporting area. Certification status, ballot accounting and the voting system determine what the numbers can support.
Identify the election and the reporting stage
A preliminary publication, an election-night update and a final certified result describe different stages. Electionpedia retains the source’s status rather than treating every displayed number as final. For historical research, the source version remains important because later corrections can change a total without changing the identity of the election.
Read the denominator
A vote share needs a denominator: candidate votes, valid votes, ballots cast or another published base. Turnout can use a different base again. Compare the labels before comparing percentages. A margin in votes and a margin in percentage points answer related but different questions.
Read the full election results guide →