First-ranked direct candidate
Mirco Carloni
80,393 valid direct-candidate votes · 44.21%.
Official Ministry open data · single-member district
MARCHE - U04 (PESARO) result.
Mirco Carloni received 80,393 votes (44.21%) and ranked first in MARCHE - U04 (PESARO) in the official Italian Ministry 2022 Chamber open-data file.
All published direct candidates
10 candidates, every associated list.
The candidate total can exceed the associated list marks because the source separately records ballots marked only for the direct candidate.
| Candidate | Associated lists | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mirco CarloniFirst-ranked · source-derived district winner | 80,393 | 44.21% | |
| Giordano MasiniRank 2 | 50,889 | 27.98% | |
| Rossella AccotoRank 3 | MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE 22,212Candidate-only difference: 1,071 | 23,283 | 12.80% |
| Federico Tale'Rank 4 | AZIONE - ITALIA VIVA - CALENDA 12,906Candidate-only difference: 836 | 13,742 | 7.56% |
| Stefano PuzzerRank 5 | ITALEXIT PER L'ITALIA 4,407Candidate-only difference: 195 | 4,602 | 2.53% |
| Dalibor CvejicRank 6 | ITALIA SOVRANA E POPOLARE 2,258Candidate-only difference: 71 | 2,329 | 1.28% |
| Alessio CanaliniRank 7 | VITA 2,009Candidate-only difference: 90 | 2,099 | 1.15% |
| Renzo SavelliRank 8 | UNIONE POPOLARE CON DE MAGISTRIS 1,834Candidate-only difference: 169 | 2,003 | 1.10% |
| Chiara PizzornoRank 9 | PARTITO COMUNISTA ITALIANO 1,851Candidate-only difference: 62 | 1,913 | 1.05% |
| Lorena NarcisiRank 10 | ALTERNATIVA PER L'ITALIA - NO GREEN PASS 564Candidate-only difference: 44 | 608 | 0.33% |
Reading guideElection results
How to interpret this record
MARCHE - U04 (PESARO) 2022 Chamber result
An election result is a dated publication about a defined contest and reporting area. Certification status, ballot accounting and the voting system determine what the numbers can support.
Identify the election and the reporting stage
A preliminary publication, an election-night update and a final certified result describe different stages. Electionpedia retains the source’s status rather than treating every displayed number as final. For historical research, the source version remains important because later corrections can change a total without changing the identity of the election.
Read the denominator
A vote share needs a denominator: candidate votes, valid votes, ballots cast or another published base. Turnout can use a different base again. Compare the labels before comparing percentages. A margin in votes and a margin in percentage points answer related but different questions.
Read the full election results guide →