First-ranked direct candidate
Raffaele Nevi
100,215 valid direct-candidate votes · 46.98%.
Official Ministry open data · single-member district
UMBRIA - U01 (TERNI) result.
Raffaele Nevi received 100,215 votes (46.98%) and ranked first in UMBRIA - U01 (TERNI) in the official Italian Ministry 2022 Chamber open-data file.
All published direct candidates
10 candidates, every associated list.
The candidate total can exceed the associated list marks because the source separately records ballots marked only for the direct candidate.
| Candidate | Associated lists | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaele NeviFirst-ranked · source-derived district winner | 100,215 | 46.98% | |
| Francesco De RebottiRank 2 | 56,027 | 26.26% | |
| Ilaria GabrielliRank 3 | MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE 26,278Candidate-only difference: 1,009 | 27,287 | 12.79% |
| Franco Raimondo BarbabellaRank 4 | AZIONE - ITALIA VIVA - CALENDA 15,023Candidate-only difference: 708 | 15,731 | 7.37% |
| Andrea BindocciRank 5 | ITALEXIT PER L'ITALIA 4,166Candidate-only difference: 91 | 4,257 | 2.00% |
| Matteo NataliniRank 6 | ITALIA SOVRANA E POPOLARE 2,938Candidate-only difference: 99 | 3,037 | 1.42% |
| Anna De CarloRank 7 | PARTITO COMUNISTA ITALIANO 2,698Candidate-only difference: 73 | 2,771 | 1.30% |
| Benedetta CalderigiRank 8 | UNIONE POPOLARE CON DE MAGISTRIS 2,596Candidate-only difference: 149 | 2,745 | 1.29% |
| Alessandra GaraffaRank 9 | VITA 1,074Candidate-only difference: 46 | 1,120 | 0.53% |
| Valentina Maria Carmela ParisiRank 10 | MASTELLA NOI DI CENTRO EUROPEISTI 119Candidate-only difference: 6 | 125 | 0.06% |
Reading guideElection results
How to interpret this record
UMBRIA - U01 (TERNI) 2022 Chamber result
An election result is a dated publication about a defined contest and reporting area. Certification status, ballot accounting and the voting system determine what the numbers can support.
Identify the election and the reporting stage
A preliminary publication, an election-night update and a final certified result describe different stages. Electionpedia retains the source’s status rather than treating every displayed number as final. For historical research, the source version remains important because later corrections can change a total without changing the identity of the election.
Read the denominator
A vote share needs a denominator: candidate votes, valid votes, ballots cast or another published base. Turnout can use a different base again. Compare the labels before comparing percentages. A margin in votes and a margin in percentage points answer related but different questions.
Read the full election results guide →