Electionpedia.com
Sweden/2022 Riksdag/Dominika Peczynski
Historical candidate personal-vote record · no current-tenure claim

Dominika Peczynski

Dominika Peczynski received 458 personal votes in the Swedish Election Authority's historical 2022 Riksdag candidate records for Liberalerna (tidigare Folkpartiet). This page does not infer elected or current-member status.

458personal votes
36065source candidate number
0003source party code
13constituency records
Official ballot identity

Liberalerna (tidigare Folkpartiet)

The source associates this candidate with list numbers 02586, 02587, 05423. Candidate identity and personal votes are reproduced from Valmyndigheten without adding biography or membership claims.

Source rows15Aggregated without deduplicating away list-specific votes
Published constituency records

Dominika Peczynski's source-reported personal votes by constituency.

ConstituencyPersonal votes
Stockholms kommunConstituency 01242
Stockholms länConstituency 02197
Södermanlands länConstituency 043
Jönköpings länConstituency 062
Gotlands länConstituency 092
Malmö kommunConstituency 112
Göteborgs kommunConstituency 162
Västra Götalands läns västraConstituency 172
Örebro länConstituency 222
Uppsala länConstituency 031
Östergötlands länConstituency 051
Blekinge länConstituency 101
Norrbottens länConstituency 291
Critical interpretation

Personal votes are not an elected-status field.

Candidate pages publish official personal-vote records and ballot-source identifiers; they do not infer that a candidate was elected.

Source: Valmyndigheten 2022 personal-vote workbook.

How to interpret this record

Dominika Peczynski Sweden 2022 Riksdag Personal Vote Result

An election result is a dated publication about a defined contest and reporting area. Certification status, ballot accounting and the voting system determine what the numbers can support.

Identify the election and the reporting stage

A preliminary publication, an election-night update and a final certified result describe different stages. Electionpedia retains the source’s status rather than treating every displayed number as final. For historical research, the source version remains important because later corrections can change a total without changing the identity of the election.

Read the denominator

A vote share needs a denominator: candidate votes, valid votes, ballots cast or another published base. Turnout can use a different base again. Compare the labels before comparing percentages. A margin in votes and a margin in percentage points answer related but different questions.

Read the full election results guide →