Direct answer
John Healey was elected.
John Healey received 16,612 votes (49.00%). Adam Wood received 9,704 votes (28.62%).
- Winning party
- Labour
- Runner-up party
- Reform UK
- Winning majority
- 6,908
- Turnout
- 49.04%
- Valid votes
- 33,904
- Electorate
- 69,133
Historical verified result · E14001436
Rawmarsh and Conisbrough general election result, 2024.
John Healey (Labour) won Rawmarsh and Conisbrough in the 2024 UK general election by 6,908 votes over Adam Wood (Reform UK).
Complete candidate result
All 6 candidates.
| Place | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John Healey ↗Elected | Labour | 16,612 | 49.00% |
| 2 | Adam Wood | Reform UK | 9,704 | 28.62% |
| 3 | Oliver Harvey | Conservative | 4,496 | 13.26% |
| 4 | Tom Hill | Green Party | 1,687 | 4.98% |
| 5 | Paul Horton | Liberal Democrat | 1,137 | 3.35% |
| 6 | Robert Watson | Workers Party of Britain | 268 | 0.79% |
Permanent constituency record
Rawmarsh and Conisbrough, England
- Electionpedia ID
- eop-result-uk-2024-commons-e14001436
- Official constituency code
- E14001436
- Region
- Yorkshire and The Humber
- Nation
- England
- Polling date
- 4 July 2024
- Result summary
- Lab hold
- Invalid ballots
- 109
Coverage boundary
Election results are not a current roster.
These are historical 4 July 2024 results. They are not a current membership roster and do not identify candidates for a future election.
Candidate policies, biographies, current tenure, and political finance remain separate layers. Electionpedia does not manufacture those fields from a vote result.
Reading guideElection results
How to interpret this record
Rawmarsh and Conisbrough General Election Result 2024: John Healey Won
An election result is a dated publication about a defined contest and reporting area. Certification status, ballot accounting and the voting system determine what the numbers can support.
Identify the election and the reporting stage
A preliminary publication, an election-night update and a final certified result describe different stages. Electionpedia retains the source’s status rather than treating every displayed number as final. For historical research, the source version remains important because later corrections can change a total without changing the identity of the election.
Read the denominator
A vote share needs a denominator: candidate votes, valid votes, ballots cast or another published base. Turnout can use a different base again. Compare the labels before comparing percentages. A margin in votes and a margin in percentage points answer related but different questions.
Read the full election results guide →