Direct answer
Derek Twigg was elected.
Derek Twigg received 23,484 votes (61.61%). Jake Fraser received 7,059 votes (18.52%).
- Winning party
- Labour
- Runner-up party
- Reform UK
- Winning majority
- 16,425
- Turnout
- 54.33%
- Valid votes
- 38,116
- Electorate
- 70,161
Historical verified result · E14001584
Widnes and Halewood general election result, 2024.
Derek Twigg (Labour) won Widnes and Halewood in the 2024 UK general election by 16,425 votes over Jake Fraser (Reform UK).
Complete candidate result
All 6 candidates.
| Place | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Derek Twigg ↗Elected | Labour | 23,484 | 61.61% |
| 2 | Jake Fraser | Reform UK | 7,059 | 18.52% |
| 3 | Sean Houlston | Conservative | 3,507 | 9.20% |
| 4 | Nancy Mills | Green Party | 2,058 | 5.40% |
| 5 | David Coveney | Liberal Democrat | 1,593 | 4.18% |
| 6 | Michael Murphy | Workers Party of Britain | 415 | 1.09% |
Permanent constituency record
Widnes and Halewood, England
- Electionpedia ID
- eop-result-uk-2024-commons-e14001584
- Official constituency code
- E14001584
- Region
- North West
- Nation
- England
- Polling date
- 4 July 2024
- Result summary
- Lab hold
- Invalid ballots
- 95
Coverage boundary
Election results are not a current roster.
These are historical 4 July 2024 results. They are not a current membership roster and do not identify candidates for a future election.
Candidate policies, biographies, current tenure, and political finance remain separate layers. Electionpedia does not manufacture those fields from a vote result.
Reading guideElection results
How to interpret this record
Widnes and Halewood General Election Result 2024: Derek Twigg Won
An election result is a dated publication about a defined contest and reporting area. Certification status, ballot accounting and the voting system determine what the numbers can support.
Identify the election and the reporting stage
A preliminary publication, an election-night update and a final certified result describe different stages. Electionpedia retains the source’s status rather than treating every displayed number as final. For historical research, the source version remains important because later corrections can change a total without changing the identity of the election.
Read the denominator
A vote share needs a denominator: candidate votes, valid votes, ballots cast or another published base. Turnout can use a different base again. Compare the labels before comparing percentages. A margin in votes and a margin in percentage points answer related but different questions.
Read the full election results guide →