How to interpret this record
Nathan R. Scott California Judicial Election 2026: What Yes and No Mean
A court, a judgeship and a judge are related but distinct records. Judicial research starts with the court’s jurisdiction and the type of appointment or election involved.
Identify the court first
Federal and state courts are different systems, and trial and appellate courts have different roles. A biography should be read with the court, position and service dates it actually describes. A court directory can establish membership of a body without establishing that every member is appearing on the current ballot.
Understand the judicial ballot
A judicial ballot question may ask voters to retain or elect a named judge, depending on the jurisdiction and proceeding. In a yes-or-no question, begin with the exact official wording and the published effect of each choice. Do not assume the page describes a head-to-head race, a partisan primary or a choice that applies statewide unless the source says so.
Read the full courts & judges guide →Nathan R. Scott
Associate Justice, Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three · California General Election · 2026-11-03
For Associate Justice, Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three
Shall Associate Justice NATHAN R. SCOTT be elected to the office for the term provided by law?
Appears in the Fourth Appellate District: Imperial, Inyo, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego.
Elect Nathan R. Scott to the Court of Appeal for the term provided by law.
Do not elect Nathan R. Scott to the Court of Appeal for the term provided by law.
This ballot record is connected to the official 2026 judicial roster.
See the independently sourced court membership record separately from this election-specific ballot question.
Background and experience
Justice Nate Scott brings 12 years of trial court experience, including 9 years on the civil panel and 3 years on the family law panel…
Read the official biography of Nathan R. Scott ↗ · California Courts · checked