Electionpedia.com
FEC filing · Reported office: U.S. House · California · District 40

Reported spending opposing Young Kim

Americans 4 Security PAC reported $45,415.11 in independent expenditures opposing Young Kim. Reported dates require source review.

Reported amount$45,415.11

Mailer

Reported opposition
One filing row · 2026 cycle

Source snapshot: October 16, 2026. Later filings or amendments may change the record.

Source-date anomaly

  • Dissemination date 2026-04-27 is after the FEC receipt date 2026-04-25.

Original values and source identifiers are retained below. This page is excluded from search indexing and the political-ad sitemap. These flags do not establish wrongdoing.

Follow the reported spending

Who, what, and why this record exists.

Filing identifiers ↓
What was reported?
MailerOriginal purpose text supplied by the filer.
Who was the payee?
Art & Copy PartnersThe named payee, not necessarily the publisher or platform.
Which election?
Primary2026 reporting cycle. The filing’s election designation is not proof of ballot qualification.
Candidate party in this filing
REPUBLICAN PARTYFiler-supplied affiliation, not an independent check of current status.
Reported dates

When was it reported?

DisseminationApril 27, 2026

Reported date the communication was distributed.

ExpenditureApril 25, 2026

Expenditure date supplied by the filer.

Received by the FECApril 25, 2026

Receipt date for the report, not the ad’s publication date.

These fields describe different events and are shown as reported—not combined into a single “ad date.” FEC field definitions ↗

Read the record correctly

Outside spending, not a donation to the candidate.

The FEC defines an independent expenditure as spending on a communication advocating a candidate’s election or defeat, made independently of the candidate or party. That is the category reported here—not proof that the FEC has verified every claim in this filing.

How the FEC defines independent expenditures ↗

A finance row is not the ad itself.

This connected record does not include the ad’s text, video, impressions, audience, or verified platform. Purpose and payee names alone cannot establish those details, effectiveness, coordination, or wrongdoing.

Support or opposition is the filer’s reported designation, not Electionpedia’s position.

Keep following the source trail

From the October 16, 2026 snapshot; this is not a complete or live spending total. Dates below use dissemination, then expenditure, then receipt when earlier fields are absent.

Source details & filing identifiers

Identifiers let you match this row to the original source. They are not additional spending amounts.

Spender FEC ID
C00733352
Candidate FEC ID
H8CA39240
FEC file number
1971225
Transaction ID
SE.4623
Filing image
202604259866699125
Amendment code
N
Election code
P
Reported district code
40
Office code
H
Electionpedia ID
eop-ad-11qrj65

Source snapshot checked October 16, 2026. The filing links lead to the FEC; access and availability are controlled by that agency. Original and amended reports can overlap, so these rows should not be summed as a verified total without reconciliation.