Electionpedia.com
Search public records
Menu
2026 FEC independent expenditures

Political advertising filings

Search reported spending by sponsor, candidate, purpose or payee, then open the source filing.

Clear filters
More filters · active

Finance filings do not establish ad creative, audiences, impressions or whether anyone saw an ad.

Source-row directory

240 matching records

Page 16 of 16 · current rows first; source anomalies and historical rows last

OPPOSECalifornia · District 7

Working Families Party PAC

reported spending involving Doris Matsui

TV adsLC Media LLC

Amount
$100,000.00
Dissemination
Oct 13, 2026
Expenditure date
Oct 8, 2026
FEC candidate
H6CA05195
Source anomaly · reported dates require review
  • Dissemination date 2026-10-13 is after the FEC receipt date 2026-10-10.

Original values remain as reported; this flag does not establish wrongdoing.

Inspect source record →Official FEC filing ↗
SUPPORTCalifornia · District 7

Working Families Party PAC

reported spending involving Mai Vang

TV adsLC Media LLC

Amount
$100,000.00
Dissemination
Oct 13, 2026
Expenditure date
Oct 8, 2026
FEC candidate
H6CA07175
Source anomaly · reported dates require review
  • Dissemination date 2026-10-13 is after the FEC receipt date 2026-10-10.

Original values remain as reported; this flag does not establish wrongdoing.

Inspect source record →Official FEC filing ↗
OPPOSEMichigan · District 7

Working Families Party PAC

reported spending involving Thomas More Barrett

Digital adsChallengers, LLC

Amount
$83,965.00
Dissemination
Oct 13, 2026
Expenditure date
Oct 8, 2026
FEC candidate
H2MI07123
Source anomaly · reported dates require review
  • Dissemination date 2026-10-13 is after the FEC receipt date 2026-10-10.

Original values remain as reported; this flag does not establish wrongdoing.

Inspect source record →Official FEC filing ↗
SUPPORTCalifornia · District 22

Working Families Party PAC

reported spending involving Randy Villegas

Digital adsLC Media LLC

Amount
$43,333.33
Dissemination
Oct 13, 2026
Expenditure date
Oct 9, 2026
FEC candidate
H6CA22190
Source anomaly · reported dates require review
  • Dissemination date 2026-10-13 is after the FEC receipt date 2026-10-10.

Original values remain as reported; this flag does not establish wrongdoing.

Inspect source record →Official FEC filing ↗
OPPOSECalifornia · District 22

Working Families Party PAC

reported spending involving David Valadao

Digital adsLC Media LLC

Amount
$43,333.33
Dissemination
Oct 13, 2026
Expenditure date
Oct 9, 2026
FEC candidate
H2CA20094
Source anomaly · reported dates require review
  • Dissemination date 2026-10-13 is after the FEC receipt date 2026-10-10.

Original values remain as reported; this flag does not establish wrongdoing.

Inspect source record →Official FEC filing ↗
SUPPORTCalifornia · District 22

Working Families Party PAC

reported spending involving Randy Villegas

Digital ads video productionLC Media LLC

Amount
$40,500.00
Dissemination
Oct 13, 2026
Expenditure date
Oct 3, 2026
FEC candidate
H6CA22190
Source anomaly · reported dates require review
  • Dissemination date 2026-10-13 is after the FEC receipt date 2026-10-08.

Original values remain as reported; this flag does not establish wrongdoing.

Inspect source record →Official FEC filing ↗
SUPPORTMichigan · District 7

Working Families Party PAC

reported spending involving William Lawrence

Digital adsChallengers, LLC

Amount
$35,985.00
Dissemination
Oct 13, 2026
Expenditure date
Oct 8, 2026
FEC candidate
H6MI07298
Source anomaly · reported dates require review
  • Dissemination date 2026-10-13 is after the FEC receipt date 2026-10-10.

Original values remain as reported; this flag does not establish wrongdoing.

Inspect source record →Official FEC filing ↗
SUPPORTArizona · District 7

WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC

reported spending involving Adelita Grijalva

TV adsLC Media LLC

Amount
$60,000.00
Dissemination
Jun 11, 2025
Expenditure date
Jun 10, 2025
FEC candidate
H6AZ07121
Source anomaly · reported dates require review
  • Dissemination date 2025-06-11 is after the FEC receipt date 2025-06-10.

Original values remain as reported; this flag does not establish wrongdoing.

Inspect source record →Official FEC filing ↗
FILING, NOT CREATIVE

A searchable sponsor record with a hard evidence boundary.

Each page preserves one current or retained historical FEC independent-expenditure filing row. Historical rows remain accessible but are excluded from current spending totals. A filing may describe advertising, mail, calls, canvassing, production, or another expressly advocated communication or activity. Electionpedia does not claim that every row contains a viewable ad creative.

Amendment policy543 superseded filing versions excluded from current rowsRetained history238 earlier public rows remain accessible and excluded from current spending totalsQuarantined spending rows174 current rows excluded from spending totalsSource-date alerts1,185 import/receipt-date anomalies retained and flaggedAPIJSON records ↗

Source: Federal Election Commission bulk data ↗, checked Oct 16, 2026. Purpose and payee text reproduce filer-supplied source fields. Electionpedia does not infer a platform, audience, targeting geography, creative content, or service actually delivered from those fields.

About these records and sources

Search current 2026 FEC independent-expenditure rows and retained historical records. Historical rows are excluded from current spending totals. The directory preserves the filer's purpose and payee text, but never pretends a finance filing contains the ad creative, audience, or proof that anyone saw it.

Current FEC filing rows25,284
Historical rows retained238
Outside spenders across all rows725
Named candidates across all rows743
All rows with purpose text25,519
WHAT THE FILING PROVES

A filer reported this spending row.

The page can reproduce the spender, candidate, amount, position code, dates, purpose, payee, election fields, and exact FEC filing image.

WHAT IT DOES NOT PROVE

What the creative said—or who saw it.

An independent-expenditure filing proves only that the filer reported the fields shown. It does not prove coordination, persuasion, effectiveness, audience exposure, candidate approval, motive, or wrongdoing.