Electionpedia.com
Search public records
Menu
2026 FEC independent expenditures

Political advertising filings

Search reported spending by sponsor, candidate, purpose or payee, then open the source filing.

Clear filters
More filters · active

Finance filings do not establish ad creative, audiences, impressions or whether anyone saw an ad.

Source-row directory

22 matching records

Page 2 of 2 · current rows first; source anomalies and historical rows last

OPPOSECalifornia · District 40

CFF

reported spending involving Ken Calvert

MEDIA PLACEMENT / MEDIA PRODUCTIONTOTAL VIDEO PLACEMENTS

Amount
$66,109.43
Dissemination
May 20, 2026
Expenditure date
May 19, 2026
FEC candidate
H2CA37023
Inspect source record →Official FEC filing ↗
OPPOSECalifornia · District 40

CFF

reported spending involving Ken Calvert

MEDIA PLACEMENT / MEDIA PRODUCTIONTOTAL VIDEO PLACEMENTS

Amount
$13,482.48
Dissemination
May 16, 2026
Expenditure date
May 13, 2026
FEC candidate
H2CA37023
Inspect source record →Official FEC filing ↗
OPPOSECalifornia · District 40

CFF

reported spending involving Ken Calvert

MEDIA PLACEMENT / MEDIA PRODUCTIONTOTAL VIDEO PLACEMENTS

Amount
$58,421.52
Dissemination
May 12, 2026
Expenditure date
May 11, 2026
FEC candidate
H2CA37023
Inspect source record →Official FEC filing ↗
SUPPORTCalifornia · District 40

CFF

reported spending involving Young Kim

P2P MESSAGINGP2P MESSAGING SOLUTIONS

Amount
$4,282.18
Dissemination
Oct 2, 2026
Expenditure date
Oct 5, 2026
FEC candidate
H8CA39240
Source anomaly · reported dates require review
  • Expenditure date 2026-10-05 is after the FEC receipt date 2026-10-04.

Original values remain as reported; this flag does not establish wrongdoing.

Inspect source record →Official FEC filing ↗
FILING, NOT CREATIVE

A searchable sponsor record with a hard evidence boundary.

Each page preserves one current or retained historical FEC independent-expenditure filing row. Historical rows remain accessible but are excluded from current spending totals. A filing may describe advertising, mail, calls, canvassing, production, or another expressly advocated communication or activity. Electionpedia does not claim that every row contains a viewable ad creative.

Amendment policy543 superseded filing versions excluded from current rowsRetained history238 earlier public rows remain accessible and excluded from current spending totalsQuarantined spending rows174 current rows excluded from spending totalsSource-date alerts1,185 import/receipt-date anomalies retained and flaggedAPIJSON records ↗

Source: Federal Election Commission bulk data ↗, checked Oct 16, 2026. Purpose and payee text reproduce filer-supplied source fields. Electionpedia does not infer a platform, audience, targeting geography, creative content, or service actually delivered from those fields.

About these records and sources

Search current 2026 FEC independent-expenditure rows and retained historical records. Historical rows are excluded from current spending totals. The directory preserves the filer's purpose and payee text, but never pretends a finance filing contains the ad creative, audience, or proof that anyone saw it.

Current FEC filing rows25,284
Historical rows retained238
Outside spenders across all rows725
Named candidates across all rows743
All rows with purpose text25,519
WHAT THE FILING PROVES

A filer reported this spending row.

The page can reproduce the spender, candidate, amount, position code, dates, purpose, payee, election fields, and exact FEC filing image.

WHAT IT DOES NOT PROVE

What the creative said—or who saw it.

An independent-expenditure filing proves only that the filer reported the fields shown. It does not prove coordination, persuasion, effectiveness, audience exposure, candidate approval, motive, or wrongdoing.