OPPOSESouth Carolina · District 0
Security Is Strength PAC
Direct MailStarboard Communications Agency
- Amount
- $247,599.43
- Dissemination
- May 15, 2026
- Expenditure date
- May 15, 2026
- FEC candidate
- S6SC04213
2026 FEC independent expenditures
Political advertising filings
Search reported spending by sponsor, candidate, purpose or payee, then open the source filing.
Finance filings do not establish ad creative, audiences, impressions or whether anyone saw an ad.
Source-row directory
129 matching records
Page 4 of 9 · current rows first; source anomalies and historical rows last
OPPOSESouth Carolina · District 0
Security Is Strength PAC
reported spending involving Mark Lynch
Text MessagingStarboard Communications Agency
- Amount
- $31,028.30
- Dissemination
- May 15, 2026
- Expenditure date
- May 15, 2026
- FEC candidate
- S6SC04213
OPPOSESouth Carolina · District 0
Security Is Strength PAC
reported spending involving Mark Lynch
Digital AdvertisingBishop Strategy
- Amount
- $2,178.10
- Dissemination
- May 11, 2026
- Expenditure date
- May 12, 2026
- FEC candidate
- S6SC04213
OPPOSESouth Carolina · District 0
Security Is Strength PAC
reported spending involving Mark Lynch
Digital AdvertisingBishop Strategy
- Amount
- $2,000.00
- Dissemination
- May 4, 2026
- Expenditure date
- May 1, 2026
- FEC candidate
- S6SC04213
OPPOSESouth Carolina · District 0
Security Is Strength PAC
reported spending involving Mark Lynch
Digital AdvertisingBishop Strategy
- Amount
- $5,000.00
- Dissemination
- Apr 29, 2026
- Expenditure date
- Apr 28, 2026
- FEC candidate
- S6SC04213
OPPOSESouth Carolina · District 0
Security Is Strength PAC
reported spending involving Mark Lynch
Digital AdvertisingBishop Strategy
- Amount
- $2,000.00
- Dissemination
- Apr 22, 2026
- Expenditure date
- Apr 21, 2026
- FEC candidate
- S6SC04213
SUPPORTSouth Carolina · District 0
Security Is Strength PAC
reported spending involving Darline Graham
Direct MailUPT Strategies LLC
- Amount
- $110,307.76
- Dissemination
- Oct 16, 2026
- Expenditure date
- Oct 14, 2026
- FEC candidate
- S6SC04437
Source anomaly · reported dates require review
- Dissemination date 2026-10-16 is after the FEC receipt date 2026-10-14.
Original values remain as reported; this flag does not establish wrongdoing.
OPPOSESouth Carolina · District 0
Security Is Strength PAC
reported spending involving Annie Andrews
Television AdvertisingPolitical Communications Advertising
- Amount
- $200,000.00
- Dissemination
- Oct 10, 2026
- Expenditure date
- Oct 7, 2026
- FEC candidate
- S6SC04239
Source anomaly · reported dates require review
- Dissemination date 2026-10-10 is after the FEC receipt date 2026-10-09.
Original values remain as reported; this flag does not establish wrongdoing.
OPPOSESouth Carolina · District 0
Security Is Strength PAC
reported spending involving Annie Andrews
Television AdvertisingFirewall Placement
- Amount
- $998,296.60
- Dissemination
- Oct 7, 2026
- Expenditure date
- Oct 7, 2026
- FEC candidate
- S6SC04239
Source anomaly · excluded from spending totals
- The reported office (H) conflicts with the connected candidate record or FEC ID (S).
Original values remain as reported; this flag does not establish wrongdoing.
SUPPORTSouth Carolina · District 0
Security Is Strength PAC
reported spending involving Darline Graham
Telephone AdvertisingEngagement Strategies, Inc
- Amount
- $45,000.00
- Dissemination
- Aug 24, 2026
- Expenditure date
- Aug 24, 2026
- FEC candidate
- S6SC04437
Source anomaly · reported dates require review
- Expenditure date 2026-08-24 is after the FEC receipt date 2026-08-22.
- Dissemination date 2026-08-24 is after the FEC receipt date 2026-08-22.
Original values remain as reported; this flag does not establish wrongdoing.
SUPPORTSouth Carolina · District 0
Security Is Strength PAC
reported spending involving Darline Graham
Text MessagingP2P Messaging Solutions
- Amount
- $21,973.80
- Dissemination
- Aug 22, 2026
- Expenditure date
- Aug 24, 2026
- FEC candidate
- S6SC04437
Source anomaly · reported dates require review
- Expenditure date 2026-08-24 is after the FEC receipt date 2026-08-22.
Original values remain as reported; this flag does not establish wrongdoing.
SUPPORTSouth Carolina · District 0
Security Is Strength PAC
reported spending involving Darline Graham
Digital AdvertisingUPT Strategies LLC
- Amount
- $198,000.00
- Dissemination
- Aug 21, 2026
- Expenditure date
- Aug 24, 2026
- FEC candidate
- S6SC04437
Source anomaly · reported dates require review
- Expenditure date 2026-08-24 is after the FEC receipt date 2026-08-22.
Original values remain as reported; this flag does not establish wrongdoing.
OPPOSESouth Carolina · District 0
Security Is Strength PAC
reported spending involving Ralph Norman
Television AdvertisingFirewall Placement
- Amount
- $92,427.39
- Dissemination
- Aug 21, 2026
- Expenditure date
- Aug 24, 2026
- FEC candidate
- S6SC04445
Source anomaly · reported dates require review
- Expenditure date 2026-08-24 is after the FEC receipt date 2026-08-22.
Original values remain as reported; this flag does not establish wrongdoing.
OPPOSESouth Carolina · District 0
Security Is Strength PAC
reported spending involving Ralph Norman
Digital AdvertisingAmerican Political Consulting
- Amount
- $180,180.75
- Dissemination
- Aug 12, 2026
- Expenditure date
- Sep 28, 2026
- FEC candidate
- S6SC04445
Source anomaly · reported dates require review
- Expenditure date 2026-09-28 is after the FEC receipt date 2026-09-26.
Original values remain as reported; this flag does not establish wrongdoing.
SUPPORTSouth Carolina · District 0
Security Is Strength PAC
reported spending involving Darline Graham
Digital AdvertisingAmerican Political Consulting, LLC
- Amount
- $140,381.96
- Dissemination
- Aug 10, 2026
- Expenditure date
- Sep 28, 2026
- FEC candidate
- S6SC04437
Source anomaly · reported dates require review
- Expenditure date 2026-09-28 is after the FEC receipt date 2026-09-26.
Original values remain as reported; this flag does not establish wrongdoing.
FILING, NOT CREATIVE
A searchable sponsor record with a hard evidence boundary.
Each page preserves one current or retained historical FEC independent-expenditure filing row. Historical rows remain accessible but are excluded from current spending totals. A filing may describe advertising, mail, calls, canvassing, production, or another expressly advocated communication or activity. Electionpedia does not claim that every row contains a viewable ad creative.
Amendment policy543 superseded filing versions excluded from current rowsRetained history238 earlier public rows remain accessible and excluded from current spending totalsQuarantined spending rows174 current rows excluded from spending totalsSource-date alerts1,185 import/receipt-date anomalies retained and flaggedAPIJSON records ↗
Source: Federal Election Commission bulk data ↗, checked Oct 16, 2026. Purpose and payee text reproduce filer-supplied source fields. Electionpedia does not infer a platform, audience, targeting geography, creative content, or service actually delivered from those fields.
About these records and sources
Search current 2026 FEC independent-expenditure rows and retained historical records. Historical rows are excluded from current spending totals. The directory preserves the filer's purpose and payee text, but never pretends a finance filing contains the ad creative, audience, or proof that anyone saw it.
Current FEC filing rows25,284
Historical rows retained238
Outside spenders across all rows725
Named candidates across all rows743
All rows with purpose text25,519
A filer reported this spending row.
The page can reproduce the spender, candidate, amount, position code, dates, purpose, payee, election fields, and exact FEC filing image.
What the creative said—or who saw it.
An independent-expenditure filing proves only that the filer reported the fields shown. It does not prove coordination, persuasion, effectiveness, audience exposure, candidate approval, motive, or wrongdoing.