Electionpedia.com
Search public records
Menu
2026 FEC independent expenditures

Political advertising filings

Search reported spending by sponsor, candidate, purpose or payee, then open the source filing.

Clear filters
More filters · active

Finance filings do not establish ad creative, audiences, impressions or whether anyone saw an ad.

Source-row directory

25 matching records

Page 1 of 2 · current rows first; source anomalies and historical rows last

OPPOSEVirginia · District 2

DMFI PAC

reported spending involving Jennifer Kiggans

Digital Advertising Buy & Production (Estimate)Trilogy Interactive LLC

Amount
$900,000.00
Dissemination
Sep 29, 2026
Expenditure date
Sep 28, 2026
FEC candidate
H2VA02064
Inspect source record →Official FEC filing ↗
SUPPORTMichigan · District 0

DMFI PAC

reported spending involving Haley Stevens

Digital Advertising Buy & Production (Estimate)Trilogy Interactive LLC

Amount
$8,322.00
Dissemination
Jul 15, 2026
Expenditure date
Jul 15, 2026
FEC candidate
S6MI00426
Inspect source record →Official FEC filing ↗
OPPOSETexas · District 35

DMFI PAC

reported spending involving Maureen Galindo

Digital Production & Advertising (Estimate)Trilogy Interactive LLC

Amount
$2,000.00
Dissemination
May 20, 2026
Expenditure date
May 20, 2026
FEC candidate
H6TX35103
Inspect source record →Official FEC filing ↗
OPPOSECalifornia · District 48

DMFI PAC

reported spending involving Ammar Campa-Najjar

Television Advertising Buy (Estimate)Thematic Campaigns

Amount
$250,000.00
Dissemination
May 18, 2026
Expenditure date
May 18, 2026
FEC candidate
H8CA50098
Inspect source record →Official FEC filing ↗
OPPOSECalifornia · District 22

DMFI PAC

reported spending involving Randy Villegas

Television Advertising Buy & Production (Estimate)Strategic Placement Media

Amount
$500,000.00
Dissemination
May 8, 2026
Expenditure date
May 7, 2026
FEC candidate
H6CA22190
Inspect source record →Official FEC filing ↗
FILING, NOT CREATIVE

A searchable sponsor record with a hard evidence boundary.

Each page preserves one current or retained historical FEC independent-expenditure filing row. Historical rows remain accessible but are excluded from current spending totals. A filing may describe advertising, mail, calls, canvassing, production, or another expressly advocated communication or activity. Electionpedia does not claim that every row contains a viewable ad creative.

Amendment policy543 superseded filing versions excluded from current rowsRetained history238 earlier public rows remain accessible and excluded from current spending totalsQuarantined spending rows174 current rows excluded from spending totalsSource-date alerts1,185 import/receipt-date anomalies retained and flaggedAPIJSON records ↗

Source: Federal Election Commission bulk data ↗, checked Oct 16, 2026. Purpose and payee text reproduce filer-supplied source fields. Electionpedia does not infer a platform, audience, targeting geography, creative content, or service actually delivered from those fields.

About these records and sources

Search current 2026 FEC independent-expenditure rows and retained historical records. Historical rows are excluded from current spending totals. The directory preserves the filer's purpose and payee text, but never pretends a finance filing contains the ad creative, audience, or proof that anyone saw it.

Current FEC filing rows25,284
Historical rows retained238
Outside spenders across all rows725
Named candidates across all rows743
All rows with purpose text25,519
WHAT THE FILING PROVES

A filer reported this spending row.

The page can reproduce the spender, candidate, amount, position code, dates, purpose, payee, election fields, and exact FEC filing image.

WHAT IT DOES NOT PROVE

What the creative said—or who saw it.

An independent-expenditure filing proves only that the filer reported the fields shown. It does not prove coordination, persuasion, effectiveness, audience exposure, candidate approval, motive, or wrongdoing.