ElectionpediaCampaign money
READING THIS ENTRYCampaign money
How to interpret this record

Rwt Production Political Campaign Vendor Payments 2026

Campaign-finance records describe reported financial activity. Their meaning depends on the committee, reporting period, transaction type and filing version—not just the size of a headline number.

Four numbers answer different questions

Receipts describe money coming into a reporting entity. Disbursements describe money going out. Cash on hand is a balance at a particular reporting date, and debts are obligations reported under the relevant rules. These figures are not interchangeable. A committee can have activity in more than one cycle, so a comparison needs matching dates and the same type of reporting entity.

Read the period and the amendment

Campaign reports cover stated periods and can later be amended. A recently imported file is not necessarily a report about recent activity. Look for the coverage-through date as well as the date Electionpedia checked or imported the source. When a source identifies a replacement or amendment, adding every version together can overstate the underlying activity.

Read the full campaign money guide →
Home/Campaign vendors/Rwt Production
Organization payee-name aggregate · official FEC data

Rwt Production

Campaign operating expenditures filed under this conservatively normalized payee name. Electionpedia does not assert corporate identity, ownership, ideology, or services beyond what the records show.

17 committees240 payments2025–2026 cycle
Direct answer · current non-memo rows

How much did federal committees report paying Rwt Production?

$3,864,092.35 across current organization-payment rows in the 2026 FEC operating-expenditures file.

This is an aggregate by normalized filing name. It is not revenue, profit, a verified contract total, or proof that similarly named legal entities are the same organization.

Source: Federal Election Commission Schedule B operating expenditures.

Current amount$3,864,092
Itemized payments240
Committees17
Committee → organization payee

Largest published committee relationships

FEC OPERATING EXPENDITURES

This page publishes at most 75 committee relationships for a payee-name group. The global amount above includes every current eligible row in the source aggregate.

COOPER FOR NORTH CAROLINA24 itemized payments · latest Jun 18, 2026
$804,006.99
PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT39 itemized payments · latest Aug 11, 2026
$598,444.65
CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO FOR SENATE27 itemized payments · latest Jun 11, 2026
$538,358.26
MAGGIE FOR NH23 itemized payments · latest Jun 18, 2026
$378,609.55
314 ACTION FUND26 itemized payments · latest Aug 19, 2026
$349,129.33
MILLS FOR MAINE9 itemized payments · latest Apr 15, 2026
$194,031.15
BUILD THE BARN PAC4 itemized payments · latest Nov 4, 2025
$70,503.92
STOP REPUBLICANS11 itemized payments · latest May 19, 2026
$43,406.21
314 ACTION IMPACT SLATE7 itemized payments · latest Aug 4, 2026
$42,585.92
MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION30 itemized payments · latest Jun 8, 2026
$33,524.82
JOSH HARDER FOR CONGRESS5 itemized payments · latest Apr 27, 2026
$23,739.70
VINDMAN FOR CONGRESS6 itemized payments · latest Jul 13, 2026
$12,747.05
SEAN MCCANN FOR CONGRESS2 itemized payments · latest Jul 15, 2026
$3,005.27
AGER FOR CONGRESS1 itemized payment · latest Apr 27, 2026
$2,684.88
SARAH FOR IOWA1 itemized payment · latest Apr 26, 2026
$1,564.96
MCCLELLAN FOR CONGRESS1 itemized payment · latest May 21, 2025
$1,364.22
Method boundary

Payee names are evidence, not conclusions.

Organizations only

Individual payees are excluded from this published store.

Amendment-normalized

5,262 superseded transaction versions were removed using committee, report, and transaction identifiers.

Memo rows excluded

358,460 memo-code X rows are excluded from totals because the FEC says they are not included in the itemization total.

Conservative matching

Punctuation and a small set of corporate suffixes are normalized. Electionpedia does not perform unverified corporate-family resolution.