ElectionpediaCampaign money
READING THIS ENTRYCampaign money
How to interpret this record

Smart Media Group LLC Political Campaign Vendor Payments 2026

Campaign-finance records describe reported financial activity. Their meaning depends on the committee, reporting period, transaction type and filing version—not just the size of a headline number.

Four numbers answer different questions

Receipts describe money coming into a reporting entity. Disbursements describe money going out. Cash on hand is a balance at a particular reporting date, and debts are obligations reported under the relevant rules. These figures are not interchangeable. A committee can have activity in more than one cycle, so a comparison needs matching dates and the same type of reporting entity.

Read the period and the amendment

Campaign reports cover stated periods and can later be amended. A recently imported file is not necessarily a report about recent activity. Look for the coverage-through date as well as the date Electionpedia checked or imported the source. When a source identifies a replacement or amendment, adding every version together can overstate the underlying activity.

Read the full campaign money guide →
Home/Campaign vendors/Smart Media Group LLC
Organization payee-name aggregate · official FEC data

Smart Media Group LLC

Campaign operating expenditures filed under this conservatively normalized payee name. Electionpedia does not assert corporate identity, ownership, ideology, or services beyond what the records show.

18 committees58 payments2025–2026 cycle
Direct answer · current non-memo rows

How much did federal committees report paying Smart Media Group LLC?

$6,724,676.88 across current organization-payment rows in the 2026 FEC operating-expenditures file.

This is an aggregate by normalized filing name. It is not revenue, profit, a verified contract total, or proof that similarly named legal entities are the same organization.

Source: Federal Election Commission Schedule B operating expenditures.

Current amount$6,724,677
Itemized payments58
Committees18
Committee → organization payee

Largest published committee relationships

FEC OPERATING EXPENDITURES

This page publishes at most 75 committee relationships for a payee-name group. The global amount above includes every current eligible row in the source aggregate.

JOHNNY GARRETT FOR CONGRESS5 itemized payments · latest Jul 15, 2026
$1,609,021.00
CHALIFOUX FOR CONGRESS7 itemized payments · latest Aug 11, 2026
$1,092,702.00
MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATE2 itemized payments · latest Jun 3, 2026
$801,820.00
PAUL BONDAR FOR CONGRESS4 itemized payments · latest Feb 5, 2026
$653,106.00
BRENT TAYLOR FOR TENNESSEE3 itemized payments · latest Jul 16, 2026
$585,618.39
DAN CRENSHAW FOR CONGRESS4 itemized payments · latest Feb 12, 2026
$418,215.00
ADRIAN SMITH FOR CONGRESS3 itemized payments · latest May 4, 2026
$264,950.00
GEORGE MORAITIS FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE3 itemized payments · latest Jul 22, 2026
$250,280.00
EVAN POWER FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE7 itemized payments · latest Jul 24, 2026
$226,555.00
ERIC ROUSE FOR US CONGRESS3 itemized payments · latest Jan 21, 2026
$210,780.00
CITIZENS FOR JOHN RUTHERFORD1 itemized payment · latest Jul 27, 2026
$151,025.00
WHEELER FOR CONGRESS6 itemized payments · latest Feb 24, 2026
$126,089.00
LAHMEYER FOR CONGRESS INC1 itemized payment · latest Jun 5, 2026
$100,785.00
STEVE MARSHALL FOR SENATE5 itemized payments · latest May 8, 2026
$98,523.24
MONICA FOR CONGRESS1 itemized payment · latest Jun 26, 2026
$87,916.00
OBERWEIS FOR CONGRESS1 itemized payment · latest Jan 5, 2026
$21,600.00
VALADAO FOR CONGRESS1 itemized payment · latest Jun 30, 2026
$13,151.25
MARSHA FOR SENATE1 itemized payment · latest Jan 15, 2025
$12,540.00
Method boundary

Payee names are evidence, not conclusions.

Organizations only

Individual payees are excluded from this published store.

Amendment-normalized

5,262 superseded transaction versions were removed using committee, report, and transaction identifiers.

Memo rows excluded

358,460 memo-code X rows are excluded from totals because the FEC says they are not included in the itemization total.

Conservative matching

Punctuation and a small set of corporate suffixes are normalized. Electionpedia does not perform unverified corporate-family resolution.