Electionpedia.com
Canada/2025 general election/Alberta/Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner
Official historical result · district 48030

Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner federal election result, 2025.

Glen Motz (Conservative Party of Canada) won Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner in the 2025 Canadian federal election by 31,964 votes over Tom Rooke (Liberal Party of Canada).

Direct answer

Glen Motz was elected.

Glen Motz received 41,518 votes (76.7%). Tom Rooke received 9,554 votes (17.7%).

Winning party
Conservative Party of Canada
Runner-up party
Liberal Party of Canada
Winning majority
31,964
Turnout
67.4%
Ballots cast
54,439
Electors
80,711
Complete candidate result

All 4 candidates.

PlaceCandidatePartyResidenceOccupationVotesShare
1Glen MotzElectedSource incumbent markerConservative Party of CanadaMedicine Hat, Alta./ Alb.Parliamentarian/Parlementaire41,51876.7%
2Tom RookeLiberal Party of CanadaMedicine Hat, Alta./ Alb.Retired/À la retraite9,55417.7%
3Jocelyn JohnsonNew Democratic PartyEdmonton, Alta./ Alb.Communications/Communications2,5884.8%
4Andy ShadrackGreen Party of CanadaKaslo, B.C./ C.-B.Retired/À la retraite4400.8%
Permanent riding record

Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner, Alberta

Electionpedia ID
eop-result-ca-2025-commons-48030
Official district code
48030
Province or territory
Alberta
Polling date
28 April 2025
Population
103,819
Electors
80,711
Voting desks
211
Valid ballots
54,100
Rejected ballots
339
Coverage boundary

Official results are not a current roster.

These are official results for the 28 April 2025 general election. They are historical election records, not a claim about the current House membership or future candidacies.

Candidate policies, biographies, political finance, current tenure, and future candidacy remain separate sourced layers. Electionpedia does not manufacture them from a vote result.

How to interpret this record

Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner Election Result 2025: Glen Motz Won

An election result is a dated publication about a defined contest and reporting area. Certification status, ballot accounting and the voting system determine what the numbers can support.

Identify the election and the reporting stage

A preliminary publication, an election-night update and a final certified result describe different stages. Electionpedia retains the source’s status rather than treating every displayed number as final. For historical research, the source version remains important because later corrections can change a total without changing the identity of the election.

Read the denominator

A vote share needs a denominator: candidate votes, valid votes, ballots cast or another published base. Turnout can use a different base again. Compare the labels before comparing percentages. A margin in votes and a margin in percentage points answer related but different questions.

Read the full election results guide →