Electionpedia.comDane Lloyd (Conservative Party of Canada) won Parkland in the 2025 Canadian federal election by 40,778 votes over Ashley Fearnall (Liberal Party of Canada).
Dane Lloyd received 53,468 votes (75.2%). Ashley Fearnall received 12,690 votes (17.8%).
| Place | Candidate | Party | Residence | Occupation | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dane LloydElectedSource incumbent marker | Conservative Party of Canada | Stony Plain, Alta./ Alb. | Parliamentarian/Parlementaire | 53,468 | 75.2% |
| 2 | Ashley Fearnall | Liberal Party of Canada | Sturgeon County, Alta./ Alb. | Director of Human Resources/Directrice des ressources humaines | 12,690 | 17.8% |
| 3 | Keri Goad | New Democratic Party | Edmonton, Alta./ Alb. | Teacher/Enseignante | 2,949 | 4.1% |
| 4 | Jason Lavigne | People's Party of Canada | Breton, Alta./ Alb. | Independent Journalist/Journaliste indépendant | 1,066 | 1.5% |
| 5 | Daniel Birrell | Green Party of Canada | Parkland County, Alta./ Alb. | Stay-at-Home Dad/Père au foyer | 449 | 0.6% |
| 6 | Wade Klassen | United Party of Canada | Haines Junction, Y.T./ Yn | Carpenter/Charpentier | 287 | 0.4% |
| 7 | Kevin Schulthies | Christian Heritage Party | Edmonton, Alta./ Alb. | Self-Employed Graphic Designer / Marketing/Graphiste indépendant et marketing | 198 | 0.3% |
These are official results for the 28 April 2025 general election. They are historical election records, not a claim about the current House membership or future candidacies.
Candidate policies, biographies, political finance, current tenure, and future candidacy remain separate sourced layers. Electionpedia does not manufacture them from a vote result.
Parkland Election Result 2025: Dane Lloyd Won
An election result is a dated publication about a defined contest and reporting area. Certification status, ballot accounting and the voting system determine what the numbers can support.
A preliminary publication, an election-night update and a final certified result describe different stages. Electionpedia retains the source’s status rather than treating every displayed number as final. For historical research, the source version remains important because later corrections can change a total without changing the identity of the election.
A vote share needs a denominator: candidate votes, valid votes, ballots cast or another published base. Turnout can use a different base again. Compare the labels before comparing percentages. A margin in votes and a margin in percentage points answer related but different questions.
Read the full election results guide →