1,352,163 votes and 20 seats.
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA) received 12.79% of valid national votes. The final EML names 20 elected result records under this party.
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA) received 1,352,163 votes and 20 seats in the official 2025 Netherlands House result. Explore all electoral-district aggregates and people named elected for the party.
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA) received 12.79% of valid national votes. The final EML names 20 elected result records under this party.
These figures describe geographic vote totals. Seats were allocated nationally.
| Electoral district | Votes | Vote share | District vote order |
|---|---|---|---|
| UtrechtKieskring Utrecht | 136,317 | 15.78% | 2 |
| AmsterdamKieskring Amsterdam | 116,374 | 27.14% | 1 |
| ArnhemKieskring Arnhem | 112,999 | 11.32% | 5 |
| 's-HertogenboschKieskring 's-Hertogenbosch | 90,603 | 10.21% | 5 |
| LeidenKieskring Leiden | 90,007 | 11.47% | 5 |
| HaarlemKieskring Haarlem | 79,712 | 13.99% | 3 |
| Den HelderKieskring Den Helder | 76,007 | 12.07% | 4 |
| ZwolleKieskring Zwolle | 74,333 | 9.88% | 5 |
| DordrechtKieskring Dordrecht | 70,163 | 9.30% | 5 |
| MaastrichtKieskring Maastricht | 68,465 | 10.53% | 5 |
| TilburgKieskring Tilburg | 67,458 | 9.93% | 5 |
| 's-GravenhageKieskring 's-Gravenhage | 65,713 | 19.77% | 1 |
| GroningenKieskring Groningen | 60,847 | 16.62% | 2 |
| NijmegenKieskring Nijmegen | 56,704 | 15.31% | 3 |
| LeeuwardenKieskring Leeuwarden | 51,773 | 12.25% | 4 |
| RotterdamKieskring Rotterdam | 49,405 | 17.11% | 2 |
| AssenKieskring Assen | 38,834 | 11.86% | 5 |
| LelystadKieskring Lelystad | 24,687 | 10.69% | 4 |
| MiddelburgKieskring Middelburg | 21,257 | 9.14% | 6 |
| BonaireKieskring Bonaire | 505 | 13.44% | 3 |
This is the election-night result publication, not a claim about current membership after later substitutions.
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA) — 2025 Netherlands House Election Result
An election result is a dated publication about a defined contest and reporting area. Certification status, ballot accounting and the voting system determine what the numbers can support.
A preliminary publication, an election-night update and a final certified result describe different stages. Electionpedia retains the source’s status rather than treating every displayed number as final. For historical research, the source version remains important because later corrections can change a total without changing the identity of the election.
A vote share needs a denominator: candidate votes, valid votes, ballots cast or another published base. Turnout can use a different base again. Compare the labels before comparing percentages. A margin in votes and a margin in percentage points answer related but different questions.
Read the full election results guide →