Electionpedia.comCéline Thiébault-Martinez (UG) was elected in round 2 for 9ème circonscription of Seine-et-Marne with 53.65% of valid votes.
Céline Thiébault-Martinez won in round 2 under the official nuance code UG. This is the final 2024 result, not a claim about current membership or later replacements.
Ranked by the Ministry's published votes. The percentage is each candidate's share of valid votes in this round.
| Rank | Candidate | Nuance | Votes | Valid share | Registered share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morgann Vanacker | RN | 19,781 | 35.50% | 22.55% |
| 2 | Céline Thiébault-Martinez | UG | 16,521 | 29.65% | 18.83% |
| 3 | Michèle Peyron | ENS | 12,023 | 21.57% | 13.70% |
| 4 | Franck Denion | DVD | 3,834 | 6.88% | 4.37% |
| 5 | Marie-Pierre Chevallier | REG | 1,745 | 3.13% | 1.99% |
| 6 | Kamal Valcin | REG | 775 | 1.39% | 0.88% |
| 7 | Bruno-Charles Delalandre | REC | 622 | 1.12% | 0.71% |
| 8 | Florence Woods | EXG | 426 | 0.76% | 0.49% |
Ranked by the Ministry's published votes. The percentage is each candidate's share of valid votes in this round.
| Rank | Candidate | Nuance | Votes | Valid share | Registered share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Céline Thiébault-MartinezElected | UG | 27,726 | 53.65% | 31.59% |
| 2 | Morgann Vanacker | RN | 23,958 | 46.35% | 27.30% |
A candidate marked elected in the official first-round file is a first-round winner and has no second-round record. Every other constituency uses the official second-round winner. Round totals and candidate rankings remain separate.
Historical final results do not assert current National Assembly membership or later replacements.
9ème circonscription, Seine-et-Marne Election Result 2024: Céline Thiébault-Martinez
An election result is a dated publication about a defined contest and reporting area. Certification status, ballot accounting and the voting system determine what the numbers can support.
A preliminary publication, an election-night update and a final certified result describe different stages. Electionpedia retains the source’s status rather than treating every displayed number as final. For historical research, the source version remains important because later corrections can change a total without changing the identity of the election.
A vote share needs a denominator: candidate votes, valid votes, ballots cast or another published base. Turnout can use a different base again. Compare the labels before comparing percentages. A margin in votes and a margin in percentage points answer related but different questions.
Read the full election results guide →