Direct answer
Ian Lavery was elected.
Ian Lavery received 20,030 votes (49.58%). Mark Peart received 10,857 votes (26.87%).
- Winning party
- Labour
- Runner-up party
- Reform UK
- Winning majority
- 9,173
- Turnout
- 52.75%
- Valid votes
- 40,401
- Electorate
- 76,595
Historical verified result · E14001107
Blyth and Ashington general election result, 2024.
Ian Lavery (Labour) won Blyth and Ashington in the 2024 UK general election by 9,173 votes over Mark Peart (Reform UK).
Complete candidate result
All 5 candidates.
| Place | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ian Lavery ↗Elected | Labour | 20,030 | 49.58% |
| 2 | Mark Peart | Reform UK | 10,857 | 26.87% |
| 3 | Maureen Levy | Conservative | 6,121 | 15.15% |
| 4 | Steve Leyland | Green Party | 1,960 | 4.85% |
| 5 | Stephen Psallidas | Liberal Democrat | 1,433 | 3.55% |
Permanent constituency record
Blyth and Ashington, England
- Electionpedia ID
- eop-result-uk-2024-commons-e14001107
- Official constituency code
- E14001107
- Region
- North East
- Nation
- England
- Polling date
- 4 July 2024
- Result summary
- Lab hold
- Invalid ballots
- 126
Coverage boundary
Election results are not a current roster.
These are historical 4 July 2024 results. They are not a current membership roster and do not identify candidates for a future election.
Candidate policies, biographies, current tenure, and political finance remain separate layers. Electionpedia does not manufacture those fields from a vote result.
Reading guideElection results
How to interpret this record
Blyth and Ashington General Election Result 2024: Ian Lavery Won
An election result is a dated publication about a defined contest and reporting area. Certification status, ballot accounting and the voting system determine what the numbers can support.
Identify the election and the reporting stage
A preliminary publication, an election-night update and a final certified result describe different stages. Electionpedia retains the source’s status rather than treating every displayed number as final. For historical research, the source version remains important because later corrections can change a total without changing the identity of the election.
Read the denominator
A vote share needs a denominator: candidate votes, valid votes, ballots cast or another published base. Turnout can use a different base again. Compare the labels before comparing percentages. A margin in votes and a margin in percentage points answer related but different questions.
Read the full election results guide →